{"id":1992,"date":"2022-02-21T08:16:57","date_gmt":"2022-02-21T12:16:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/?p=1992"},"modified":"2022-03-10T12:52:59","modified_gmt":"2022-03-10T16:52:59","slug":"energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/","title":{"rendered":"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?ssl=1\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?resize=572%2C768\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1994\" width=\"572\" height=\"768\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?resize=762%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 762w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?resize=223%2C300&amp;ssl=1 223w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?resize=768%2C1031&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 572px) 100vw, 572px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Figure 1a. Simone Durant holding cured leaves of cigar, left, and cigarette tobacco leaves, in Joliette, Quebec, 1949. Like St. Hyacinthe in the nineteenth century, Joliette became part of Quebec\u2019s tobacco producing region in the early twentieth century. Although this photograph was taken long after Marguerite Messier grew tobacco on her farm in St. Hyacinthe, it shows a woman participating in this branch of agriculture, not unlike Messier almost a century earlier. Library and Archives Canada\/National Film Board or Canada fonds\/e011175785, <a href=\"https:\/\/recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca\/eng\/home\/record?app=fonandcol&amp;IdNumber=4948554&amp;new=-8585570900960126\">https:\/\/recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca\/eng\/home\/record?app=fonandcol&amp;IdNumber=4948554&amp;new=-8585570900960126<\/a>382<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The Messier farm in Quebec\u2019s St. Hyacinthe CSD is an example of a Farm with Average Land Funds (land and pasture), Low Livestock Funds\/Flows, and Specialized Cash Crops (tobacco) and Animal Products (wool and honey). In terms of its land size and crop energy flows, the Messier farm was almost the perfectly average farm in the CSD. It is in many ways a typical operation for this region.<a href=\"#_ftn1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a> It stands out in one important respect, however, because it was owned by a woman. In 1871, 59-year-old Marguerite Mefsier (Messier), a widow, was head of the 36.4 hectare (ha) farm.<a href=\"#_ftn2\"><sup>[2]<\/sup><\/a> Marguerite\u2019s husband Michel died in 1865 at 58 years of age.<a href=\"#_ftn3\"><sup>[3]<\/sup><\/a> She continued to farm the completely cleared parcel, and like many farms in the region she produced cash crops such as tobacco and surplus cereals. In other ways, the Messier farm was smaller than average, such as its lower number of livestock and the flows they generated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Her two sons Am\u00e9de and Antoine, ages 23 and 19, were farmers who must have done much of the farm work. A second family of the same surname, Messier, lived with them in the same house. This was 38-year-old Michel, who was a commis (or clerk), his wife Marie who was 35, and their five children, Joseph, Albina, Georges, Jean, and Ema, ages 13, 11, eight, four, and two. In the 1871 Census of Canada Michel did not report any land, livestock, crops, or products. Although we do not know the exact relationship between Marguerite\u2019s immediate family and Michel and his family, they were probably relatives\u2013possibly her eldest son, daughter-in-law, and grandchildren\u2013who lived at the farm as family members or as boarders and who pitched in to get work on the farm done. The farm was successful because of Marguerite\u2019s good fortune to have extensive pastures and other cleared land as well as family labour to work it. Her two adult sons, plus Michel, Marie, and probably Ema, their eldest child, all could have contributed labour. This was not the case for all women, of course. Another widow whose farm we examined in St. Hyacinthe, Esther Beauregard, was not nearly as well supported as was Marguerite. Esther, who had three young children, the eldest deaf, lost her farm and ended up in Hotel Dieu of St. Hyacinthe where nuns cared for the poor. Esther died impoverished at 60 years of age.<a href=\"#_ftn4\"><sup>[4]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Marguerite had an additional 12 ha in the Dominion of Canada that was outside the census subdivision in which she lived.<a href=\"#_ftn5\"><sup>[5]<\/sup><\/a> This additional 12 ha was likely close by to her 36.4 ha and used as a woodlot or, if it was improved, she may have had more pastureland, hay land, and cropland available than reported in Schedule 1 of the 1871 Census of Canada. When combined, Marguerite\u2019s two parcels of land totaled 48.4 ha.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?ssl=1\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"419\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-1024x734.jpg?resize=584%2C419&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2009\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?resize=1024%2C734&amp;ssl=1 1024w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?resize=300%2C215&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?resize=768%2C550&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?resize=1536%2C1101&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?resize=2048%2C1468&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?resize=419%2C300&amp;ssl=1 419w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?w=1168 1168w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/Carte-du-comte-de-St-Hyacinthe-1930-2669908-1871-CSD-clip-scaled.jpg?w=1752 1752w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Figure 1b.&nbsp; Carte du comt\u00e9 de St. Hyacinthe construite d\u2019apr\u00e8s les plans du Cadastre. 1:63:360. Biblioth\u00e8que de Archives nationals du Qu\u00e9bec, 1930. Approximate 1871 CSD boundary shown in green. <a href=\"https:\/\/numerique.banq.qc.ca\/patrimoine\/details\/52327\/2244832\">https:\/\/numerique.banq.qc.ca\/patrimoine\/details\/52327\/2244832<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"googlemaps\">\n\t\t\t\t<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"600\" height=\"450\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" marginheight=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\"  src=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/maps\/embed?pb=!1m18!1m12!1m3!1d714096.7494555537!2d-73.30762597018116!3d45.71461101857026!2m3!1f0!2f0!3f0!3m2!1i1024!2i768!4f13.1!3m3!1m2!1s0x4cc84dd740cd62cb:0x5040cadae4d4290!2sSaint-Hyacinthe,%20QC!5e1!3m2!1sen!2sca!4v1645385516373!5m2!1sen!2sca\"><\/iframe>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Figure 1c. Google Map of St. Hyacinthe, Quebec.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Farm Energy Funds<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Marguerite Messier\u2019s 36.4 ha was one hundred percent improved, was intensively cropped, and supported either one large family or two smaller families. Marguerite divided this parcel&#8217;s improved land roughly by thirds: 12.1 ha was in pastureland, 12.1 ha was in hay land, 9.8 ha was in cropland, and the remaining land was in gardens, orchards, buildings, and lanes. In contrast, the St. Hyacinthe CSD\u2019s 9,747 ha was not completely improved, but had 1,363 ha in woodland with the remaining 8,381 ha improved. The CSD\u2019s improved land was not evenly divided by thirds, as was the Messier farm. Instead, the hay land was proportionately smaller and the cropland larger so that the profile of the St. Hyacinthe CSD was 2,750 ha (32 percent) pastureland, 1,187 ha (14 percent) hay land, and 4,353 ha (53 percent) cropland, with the remaining 93 ha (one percent) dyked marshland, gardens, orchards, buildings, and lanes. The Messier farm was slightly larger than the average farm in St. Hyacinthe (34.4 ha); but, with the 12 ha that lay outside her CSD Marguerite had access to a bit more land than the average farmer in St. Hyacinthe. Marguerite kept horses, milk cows, and sheep, but she also had one other horned bovine and one pig. The greater region of the St. Hyacinthe CSD reported the same livestock types as the Messier farm with a similar emphasis on milk cows and sheep over other horned cattle and swine. The livestock intensity of the Messier farm was 17 LU\/km2 and the grazing intensity was .35. In contrast, the St. Hyacinthe CSD was higher at\u00a0 23.9 LU\/km2 and .59 respectively. The Messier farm had a lower grazing intensity because proportionally it provided more pasture for its animals to graze upon and, as discussed in the next section, the farm had less livestock than the average farm in St. Hyacinthe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"441\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?resize=584%2C441\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2245\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?w=769&amp;ssl=1 769w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?resize=300%2C227&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?resize=397%2C300&amp;ssl=1 397w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Figure 2a. Area Visualization of Marguerite Messier\u2019s farm in St. Hyacinthe, Quebec, 1871. Marguerite Messier\u2019s 36.4 ha is represented by the coloured rectangle, and her 12 ha is represented by the grey area that surrounds it. Her 36.4 ha is one hundred percent improved, with about two-thirds in pastureland or hay land and the remaining third in cropland.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"441\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?resize=584%2C441\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2241\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?w=769&amp;ssl=1 769w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?resize=300%2C227&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_NestedTreeMap.png?resize=397%2C300&amp;ssl=1 397w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Figure 2b. Area Visualization of the St. Hyacinthe CSD shows that it was in an earlier stage of development than Marguerite Messier\u2019s farm: approximately 20 percent of the available land was still wooded, and of the remaining 80 percent half was in fodder and half in cropland. About two-thirds of the fodder was in pastureland and one-third in hay land. As farms develop, often pastureland appears first, followed by hay land. Still, St. Hyacinthe\u2019s agroecosystem was approaching the limits of land clearing, and the remaining forest was likely valued for firewood and other critical forest products.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Farm Energy Flows<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1871, the Messier farm had 60 census standard red pine logs on hand, as well as 19 cords of wood. Likely these forest products came from the 12 ha that was outside the census subdivision in which Messier lived. The farm produced 70 bushels (bu) oats, 122 bu potatoes, 65 bu barley, 14 bu wheat, five bu peas, seven bu buckwheat, 30 bu corn, and ten pounds of tobacco. The St. Hyacinthe CSD reports the same crops as Marguerite Messier, plus beans, turnips, beets, carrots, grapes, apples, pears and\/or plums, and maple sugar. The Messier farm had a feed deficit of 279,555 MJ, and a litter deficit of 83,841 MJ. For the St.Hyacinthe CSD, the feed deficit was 392,523 MJ per farm, and the litter deficit was 93,011 MJ per farm. Marguerite\u2019s feed demand was 95 percent fodder, and with a very small hay crop in 1870, we see that even the residues from her grain crops failed to make up the feed deficit. It may be that Messier met her feed and litter requirements that year by feeding her surplus grains to the animals, or, more likely, by selling or trading them with neighbours who had feed and litter to spare. Certainly, her ten pounds of tobacco, a lucrative cash crop, would have put money into her hands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"482\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=584%2C482\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2243\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=584%2C482\" data-link=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/ampa-1871-farm-profiles-messier-22-03-09-mmm-xlsm_energygrainchart\/\" class=\"wp-image-2243\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?w=627&amp;ssl=1 627w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=300%2C248&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=363%2C300&amp;ssl=1 363w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"482\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=584%2C482\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2239\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=584%2C482\" data-link=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/ampa-1871-csd-st-hyacinthe-two-divisions-22-03-09-mmm-xlsm_energygrainchart\/\" class=\"wp-image-2239\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?w=627&amp;ssl=1 627w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=300%2C248&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyGrainChart.png?resize=363%2C300&amp;ssl=1 363w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">Figures 3a and 3b. The Messier farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD were similar in the crops grown, but the Messier farm had slightly less emphasis on tobacco. The Messier farm also reused more biomass (61.9 percent) than the St. Hyacinthe CSD (46.8 percent), partly because a higher share of Margeurite\u2019s crop produce was in feed grade grains rather than non-comestible produce like tobacco. Still, if tobacco had been removed from both profiles, Marguerite\u2019s crop produce was still consumed at a higher rate (85.8 percent) than the CSD\u2019s (77.9 percent).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The Messier farm\u2019s hay energy was less than half of its pasture energy which were 130,635 MJ and 293,349 MJ respectively. There were 224,360 MJ of residues, and the farm reused all of its fodder. For the St. Hyacinthe CSD, the hay energy (32,838,273 MJ) was about one-third of its pasture energy\u00a0 (110,650,816 MJ). There were 81,506,961 MJ of residues and the CSD reused all its fodder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"440\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=584%2C440\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2242\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=584%2C440\" data-link=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/ampa-1871-farm-profiles-messier-22-03-09-mmm-xlsm_energyfodderchart\/\" class=\"wp-image-2242\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?w=687&amp;ssl=1 687w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=300%2C226&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=398%2C300&amp;ssl=1 398w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"440\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=584%2C440\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2238\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=584%2C440\" data-link=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/ampa-1871-csd-st-hyacinthe-two-divisions-22-03-09-mmm-xlsm_energyfodderchart\/\" class=\"wp-image-2238\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?w=687&amp;ssl=1 687w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=300%2C226&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyFodderChart.png?resize=398%2C300&amp;ssl=1 398w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">Figures 4a and 4b. Fodder Crops and Pasture for the Messier farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD. In terms of energy, the Messier farm had a greater return in pasture than in hay, and this was the same for the St. Hyacinthe CSD. Both the Messier farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD reused all their fodder, including extensive residues. Messier reported only eight tons of hay cut from her 12.1 ha of hay land which is a low yield. It may be that she rented her hay land to another farmer for cutting and received the eight tons of hay as her share. If this arrangement had been the case, then it may be that she got about a quarter of the cut.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1871, the average farm in the St. Hyacinthe CSD had more livestock than did the Messier farm. Marguerite Messier had two horses over the age of three, two colts or fillies, three milk cows, one other horned bovine, eight sheep, and one swine. The farm either butchered or exported the one horned bovine, four sheep, and three swine.<a href=\"#_ftn6\"><sup>[6]<\/sup><\/a> These low, and apparently declining numbers combined with the low grazing density on her extensive pastures suggest that Marguerite was reducing the size of her herds. For comparison, and based on St. Hyacinthe\u2019s 283 farms, the average farm in St. Hyacinthe had 2.5 horses over the age of three, .8 colts or fillies, 3.7 milk cows, 13.3 sheep, and 3.4 swine, and butchered or exported 1.6 horned cattle, 6.1 sheep, and 2.9 swine. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Marguerite may have been reducing her dairy produce and specializing in other animal products, such as those from bees and sheep. This is reflected in the yields she reported for her butter, honey, and wool, and her lack of cheese. The average farm in the CSD had slightly more than twice as much butter than did the Messier farm. Marguerite reported 50 pounds of butter, but the average farm in the CSD had 104.The tables were turned, however, when it came to honey and firewood. The Messier farm had one beehive, 40 pounds of honey, and 19 cords of firewood, but the average farm in the CSD had .8 beehives, 7.6 pounds of honey, and 7 cords of wood. Where the Messier farm and the CSD are more or less on equal footing is wool. Whereas the Messier farm had 30 pounds of wool, the average farm in the CSD had 28.9. Marguerite processed some cloth from the wool, although she likely sold much of the wool to others. The average farm in the CSD had 33.3 yards of homemade cloth, whereas the Messier farm had 25. One product that the Messier farm lacked completely was homemade linen. The CSD reported 3,543 yards of homemade linen, or 12.5 yards per average farm, but the Messier farm reported none.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-3 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"479\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=584%2C479\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2244\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=584%2C479\" data-link=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/ampa-1871-farm-profiles-messier-22-03-09-mmm-xlsm_energylbpchart\/\" class=\"wp-image-2244\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?w=635&amp;ssl=1 635w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=300%2C246&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-Farm-Profiles-Messier-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=366%2C300&amp;ssl=1 366w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"479\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=584%2C479\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"2240\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=584%2C479\" data-link=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/ampa-1871-csd-st-hyacinthe-two-divisions-22-03-09-mmm-xlsm_energylbpchart\/\" class=\"wp-image-2240\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?w=635&amp;ssl=1 635w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=300%2C246&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/AMPA-1871-CSD-St.-Hyacinthe-Two-Divisions-22-03-09-MMM.xlsm_EnergyLBPChart.png?resize=366%2C300&amp;ssl=1 366w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">Figures 5a and 5b. Livestock and Barnyard Produce for the Messier farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD. The Messier farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD have very similar patterns in regard to livestock and products from livestock.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Figures 5a and 5b. Livestock and Barnyard Produce for the Messier farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD. The Messier farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD have very similar patterns in regard to livestock and products from livestock.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Marguerite Messier\u2019s 48.4 ha farm was larger than the average farm in the St. Hyacinthe CSD, yet her crop and animal energy flows were smaller. Her evenly divided pastureland, hay land, and cropland suggest a rotation of crops, possibly on a plan similar to that of the Maltais brothers whose farm we previously highlighted in this series of farm profiles. In year one the Maltais brothers\u2019 fields were sown with cereals, in years two and three those same fields were used for hay, and in years four and five they were used for pasture. The Messier farm\u2019s three milk cows produced enough milk and butter for the people living on the farm, and the slaughtered animals would have been meat for the table. Beyond providing sustenance to those living on the farm, Marguerite\u2019s focus was wool and tobacco. All in all, Marguerite\u2019s approach to operating her farm was balanced, as can be seen with her diverse crop types, probable crop rotation, and her reduced livestock density. Her farm was also multi-generational, and with a single woman as the matriarch it is perhaps not surprising that she appears to have been focusing her energy strategy on wool and tobacco, and perhaps even honey. With Michel working off the farm as a commis, or clerk, the frame for the farm becomes pluri-occupational as his wage would contribute to the farm\u2019s economy. Ultimately, the Messier farm was successful because Marguerite, her sons Am\u00e9de and Antione, plus Michel, Marie, and their eldest child Ema, provided needed labour. The photo of Simone Durant holding cured tobacco might have been taken 78 years later, but in some ways we see a little of Margeurite in her portrait.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175786-v8.jpg?ssl=1\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"584\" height=\"749\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175786-v8.jpg?resize=584%2C749\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1995\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175786-v8.jpg?resize=798%2C1024&amp;ssl=1 798w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175786-v8.jpg?resize=234%2C300&amp;ssl=1 234w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175786-v8.jpg?resize=768%2C986&amp;ssl=1 768w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175786-v8.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 584px) 100vw, 584px\" data-recalc-dims=\"1\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Figure 6a. Workers storing cured tobacco in a Quebec barn, 1949. Library and Archives Canada\/National Film Board of Canada fonds\/e011175786, <a href=\"https:\/\/recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca\/eng\/home\/record?app=fonandcol&amp;IdNumber=4948555&amp;new=-8585570900960126382\">https:\/\/recherche-collection-search.bac-lac.gc.ca\/eng\/home\/record?app=fonandcol&amp;IdNumber=4948555&amp;new=-8585570900960126382<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a> &nbsp;Previously, we have written about farms that were exceptional. For example, we have written about farms that eventually won gold in Qu\u00e9bec\u2019s Concours Provincial de M\u00e9rite Agricole (Agricultural Merit Contest) of the early twentieth century. The Thomas Maltais farm of Jonquiere, Quebec, and the Edouard and Edmund Houle farm of Nicolet, Quebec, both won gold, for example. We have also written about farms that were exceptionally large, such as the Christian B. and Joseph Snyder farm of North Waterloo, Ontario. A third category we have written about is farms with exceptional products, such as the Philip Maher farm in Windsor, Richmond,Quebec, whose farm was actually a timber extraction enterprise. Finally, we have profiled farms whose owners were listed in the <em>Dictionary of Canadian Biography<\/em>, such as the diminutive-in-size (5.3 ha) Andrew Hay Johnson farm of Falmouth, Nova Scotia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\"><sup>[2]<\/sup><\/a> \u201cMarguerite Mefsier,\u201d 1871 Census of Canda, RG31, C-10065, Library and Archives Canada (LAC), Ottawa.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\"><sup>[3]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp; \u201cMichel Messier,\u201d Quebec, Canada, Vital and Church Records (Drouin Collection), 1621-1968, Ancestry.ca. Marguerite\u2019s husband Michel died at age 58 and was buried on 18 November 1865.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\"><sup>[4]<\/sup><\/a> \u201cEsther Beauregard,\u201d 1871 Census of Canada, RG31, C-1005, LAC. See also Esther\u2019s death certificate: \u201cEsther Beauregard,\u201d Quebec, Canada, Vital and Church Records (Drouin Collection), 1621-1968, Ancestry.ca. Esther died 7 February 1887. Esther\u2019s husband Ir\u00e9n\u00e9\u00e9 Beauregard appears in the 1861 Census of Canada, but does not appear ten years later when the 1871 Census of Canada was taken. Therefore, he died after 1861 but before 1871. Esther and her children are listed in the 1881 Census of Canada. They are living (along with dozens of others) in a religious poor house, probably the Hotel Dieu of St. Hyacinthe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\"><sup>[5]<\/sup><\/a> \u201cMarguerite Mefsier,\u201d Schedule 3, 1871 Census of Canada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\"><sup>[6]<\/sup><\/a> For the 1871 Canada Census, slaughtered or exported animals were counted over and above the head count for the animals on a farm. For example, Messier\u2019s one swine plus three slaughtered or exported swine meant the swine herd had been four animals in 1871 and that 75 percent of the herd had been slaughtered or exported. The one animal that was not slaughtered or exported was probably a sow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-layout-1 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>&lt; Previous Profile (<a href=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/01\/21\/energy-on-the-edmund-and-eduoard-houle-farm-and-the-nicolet-csd-nicolet-quebec\/\">Houle<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"has-text-align-right\">Next Profile (<a href=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/25\/energy-on-the-abraham-doras-shadd-and-garrison-shadd-farm-and-the-raleigh-csd-kent-ontario\/\">Shadd<\/a>) &gt;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Messier farm in Quebec\u2019s St. Hyacinthe CSD is an example of a Farm with Average Land Funds (land and pasture), Low Livestock Funds\/Flows, and Specialized Cash Crops (tobacco) and Animal Products (wool and honey). In terms of its land &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":271,"featured_media":1994,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"footnotes":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[98,1],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec - The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec - The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Messier farm in Quebec\u2019s St. Hyacinthe CSD is an example of a Farm with Average Land Funds (land and pasture), Low Livestock Funds\/Flows, and Specialized Cash Crops (tobacco) and Animal Products (wool and honey). In terms of its land &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-02-21T12:16:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-03-10T16:52:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1343\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"mmaddison\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"mmaddison\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/\",\"name\":\"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec - The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343&ssl=1\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-02-21T12:16:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-03-10T16:52:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#\/schema\/person\/24ce0809a8a2b5608c2ad7baca1a7df6\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343&ssl=1\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1343},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/\",\"name\":\"The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI\",\"description\":\"Supporting Geospatial Research in Atlantic Canadian History\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#\/schema\/person\/24ce0809a8a2b5608c2ad7baca1a7df6\",\"name\":\"mmaddison\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/author\/mmaddison\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec - The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec - The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI","og_description":"The Messier farm in Quebec\u2019s St. Hyacinthe CSD is an example of a Farm with Average Land Funds (land and pasture), Low Livestock Funds\/Flows, and Specialized Cash Crops (tobacco) and Animal Products (wool and honey). In terms of its land &hellip; Continue reading &rarr;","og_url":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/","og_site_name":"The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI","article_published_time":"2022-02-21T12:16:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-03-10T16:52:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":1343,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"mmaddison","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"mmaddison","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/","url":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/","name":"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec - The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343&ssl=1","datePublished":"2022-02-21T12:16:57+00:00","dateModified":"2022-03-10T16:52:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#\/schema\/person\/24ce0809a8a2b5608c2ad7baca1a7df6"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343&ssl=1","width":1000,"height":1343},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/2022\/02\/21\/energy-on-the-marguerite-messier-farm-and-the-st-hyacinthe-csd-st-hyacinthe-quebec\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Energy on the Marguerite Messier Farm and the St. Hyacinthe CSD, St. Hyacinthe, Quebec"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#website","url":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/","name":"The GeoREACH Lab at UPEI","description":"Supporting Geospatial Research in Atlantic Canadian History","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/#\/schema\/person\/24ce0809a8a2b5608c2ad7baca1a7df6","name":"mmaddison","url":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/author\/mmaddison\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/files\/2022\/02\/e011175785-v8.jpg?fit=1000%2C1343&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/paUfnZ-w8","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1992"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/271"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1992"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1992\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2249,"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1992\/revisions\/2249"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1994"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/projects.upei.ca\/geolab\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}